A thematic analysis of lived experiences of bullying among school going adolescents - Anthropological insights

A thematic analysis of lived experiences of bullying among school going adolescents - Anthropological insights

Authors

  • Kawaljit Kaur Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India
  • Gayathiri Pathmanathan Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India
  • Bahadur Singh Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India
  • Kewal Krishan Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5321-0958

Keywords:

Public health, School bullying, Cyberbullying, Adolescents, Perpetrator, Retaliation, Victim

Abstract

Background and aim: Bullying is a public health concern with social and psychological consequences. In India, quantitative research on bullying prevalence has considerably grown, however, qualitative investigations remain limited. The present study explores the lived experiences of bullying among school-going adolescents with a focus on the understanding of students about bullying, their responses towards bullying incidents, peer support, the role of parents and school in bullying intervention.

Methods: The study presents the thematic analysis of open-ended responses collected from the school-going adolescents of North India. For the main study, 976 subjects were recruited from six schools with an age range 12-18 years. The responses were thematically analysed using NVivo software.

Results: Verbal and physical bullying were the most reported forms of bullying with relational and sexual bullying also predominantly represented. The classroom and the playground were reported as the most likely places where bullying incidents occur. Friends and parents emerge as the primary interveners while teachers and the school principal play a peripheral role. Peers were reported the main perpetrators for the bullying incidents in school; however, a few instances of adult perpetration such as teacher and bus conductor were also reported. Retaliation was frequently cited as a motivation for bullying by the perpetrators.

Conclusions: The findings of the present study highlight gaps in the institutional response mechanism and the significance of family and peer support. The findings also point towards the need for context-specific antibullying programmes in Indian schools. The study contributes to the growing literature on school bullying in India and offers implications for policy-making.

Author Biographies

Kawaljit Kaur, Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India

Kawaljit Kaur, MSc,

PhD student,

Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

Gayathiri Pathmanathan, Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India

Dr. Gayathiri Pathmanathan, PhD

Assistant Professor (Retired),

Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India

Bahadur Singh, Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India

Dr Bahadur Singh, PhD 

Guest Faculty

Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India

Kewal Krishan, Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India

Dr. Kewal Krishan, Ph.D., FRAI Associate Professor and former Chair, Department of Anthropology, (UGC Centre of Advanced Study) Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] +919876048205 (Mobile)

Dr. Kewal Krishan is a renowned forensic anthropologist and is presently serving as Associate Professor and former Chairperson at the Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India. He passed his BSc (Hons.), MSc (Hons.), and Ph.D. from Panjab University, India. He is well known for his contributions to forensic and biological anthropology in Indian populations. He published more than 430 articles in international and national journals of repute, including high-impact and reputed journals such as Nature, Nature Medicine, and The Lancet. Dr. Krishan has contributed to the advancement of Forensic Science and its applications in Indian populations. He has devised many methods of criminal investigation and formulae to be used in the criminal investigation process. He contributed invited chapters to the most coveted Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences (2013), Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine (2016, 2025) published by Elsevier, and Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences (2018) published by Wiley-Blackwell. He is the Editor and on the panel of editors of various reputed international journals such as Forensic Science International, Medicine Science and the Law, Archives of Public Health etc. He has been awarded the fellowship of the Royal Anthropological Institute (FRAI) of Great Britain and Ireland, London, for his contributions to forensic anthropology in India.

He has recently been included among the “WORLD RANKING OF TOP 2% SCIENTISTS” (Positioned at 11th Rank in Legal & Forensic Medicine category in the world as reported by a team of scientists at Stanford University, USA and Elsevier BV. 

His research has been cited by more than 150,000 studies in the scientific literature. His Wikipedia profile is available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kewal_Krishan_(forensic_anthropologist)

His interests include Forensics, Human biology, Biological anthropology, Human morphology, Anthropometry, Forensic podiatry, Publication ethics, and anthropological aspects of Public Health

References

1. Kupferman-Meik FE, Burris-Warmoth P, Rapaport S, Roychoudhury K, Javier RArt. Bullying in children and adolescents: a healthcare perspective. J Soc Distress Homeless. 2013 Nov;22(2):94–118. doi: 10.1179/1053078913Z.0000000006

2. Cohen S. The development of aggression. Rev Educ Res. 1971;41(1):71–85. doi: 10.3102/00346543041001071

3. Fraczek A. Violence and aggression in children and youth: A socio-psychological perspective. European Review. 1996;4(1):75–90. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199601)4:1<75::AID-EURO110>3.0.CO;2-8

4. Sreekanth Y. Bullying: An element accentuating social segregation. Education 3-13. 2009;37(3):233–45. doi: 10.1080/03004270802349463

5. Campbell M, Kettle M, Sundaram S. Societal and Cultural Considerations in Understanding Peer Bullying in India. In: Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools: Comparing European, Australian and Indian Perspectives. Cambridge University Press; 2018 May 17;26–44. doi:10.1017/9781316987384.003

6. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jan 1;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

7. Man X, Liu J, Xue Z. Effects of Bullying Forms on Adolescent Mental Health and Protective Factors: A Global Cross-Regional Research Based on 65 Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 1;19(4). doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042374

8. Han ZY, Ye ZY, Zhong BL. School bullying and mental health among adolescents: a narrative review. Transl Pediatr. 2025 Mar 31;14(3):463–72. doi: 10.21037/tp-2024-512

9. Thakkar N, van Geel M, Vedder P. A Systematic Review of Bullying and Victimization Among Adolescents in India. Int. J. Bullying Prev. 2021 Dec 1;3(4):253–69. doi: 10.1007/s42380-020-00081-4

10. Bourdieu P, Passeron JC. Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage; 1990.

11. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice. In: The new social theory reader. 2020 Jul 24 (pp. 80-86). Routledge.

12. Kumar B. Capital, habitus and symbolic violence: a Bourdieusian analysis of mode of reproductions in Indian schools. Int J Soc Sci Hum Res. 2025;8(9):7416–22. doi:10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i9-87

13. Chhabria MS, Rao A, Rao C, Somashekar AR S. Prevalence and Forms of Bullying Perpetration and Victimization in Indian Adolescents. Int J Med Public Health. 2020 Nov 27;10(4):213–6. doi: 10.5530/ijmedph.2020.4.45

14. Schaal B, Tremblay RE, Soussignan R, Susman EJ. Male testosterone linked to high social dominance but low physical aggression in early adolescence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Oct 1;35(10):1322–30. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199610000-00019

15. Tremblay RE. Testosterone, physical aggression, dominance, and physical development in early adolescence. Int J Behav Dev. 1998 Dec 1;22(4):753–77. doi: 10.1080/016502598384153

16. Silva MAI, Pereira B, Mendonça D, Nunes B, de Oliveira WA. The involvement of girls and boys with bullying: An analysis of gender differences. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Dec 5;10(12):6820–31. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10126820

17. Johansson S, Englund G. Cyberbullying and its relationship with physical, verbal, and relational bullying: A structural equation modelling approach. Educ Psychol (Lond). 2021 Mar 16;41(3):320–37. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2020.1769033

18. UNESCO. Global education monitoring report: gender report: building bridges for gender equality [Internet]. Paris: UNESCO; 2019 Jan [cited 2026 Apr 28]. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368753

19. Stein N. Sexual harassment in school: The public performance of gendered violence. Harv Educ Rev. 1995 Jul 1;65(2):145–63. doi: 10.17763/haer.65.2.7080h5t354300557

20. Shabanipour M. Psycho-Social and Cultural Barriers in Disclosure of Victimization and Mental Health of the Sexually Abused Indian and Iranian Women. Int J Humanit Cult Stud. (IJHCS) ISSN. 2016 Feb;2356–5926.

21. Fleming K, Kruger LM. “She keeps his secrets”: a gendered analysis of the impact of shame on the non-disclosure of sexual violence in one low-income South African community: original contributions. African safety promotion. 2013 Jan 1;11(2):107–24.

22. Zinzow HM, Thompson M. Barriers to reporting sexual victimization: Prevalence and correlates among undergraduate women. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2011 Oct 1;20(7):711–25. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2011.613447

23. Carson DK, Foster JM, Chowdhury A. Sexual Abuse of Children and Youth in India An Anthropological Perspective. Oriental Anthropol. 2014 Dec;14(2):343–64. doi: 10.1177/0976343020140212

24. Nohilly M, Treacy M. Teachers’ perceptions of enabling and hindering factors in child abuse disclosures. Child Prot Pract. 2024 Dec 1;3:100064. doi: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100064

25. Sharpe G. Barriers to Reporting Teachers’ Abuse of Students. Int J Learn Dev. 2024 May 22;14(2):17. doi: 10.5296/ijld.v14i2.21924

26. Biswas T, Scott JG, Munir K, et al. Global variation in the prevalence of bullying victimisation amongst adolescents: Role of peer and parental supports. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Mar 1;20. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100276

27. Rana M, Gupta M, Malhi P, Grover S, Kaur M. Prevalence and correlates of bullying perpetration and victimization among school-going adolescents in Chandigarh, North India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 1;62(5):531–9. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_444_19

28. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2000 Feb;52(1):1–26.

29. Burns S, Maycock B, Cross D, Brown G. ‘Woodpushers are gay’: the role of provocation in bullying. Int J Ment Health Promot. 2008 Nov;10(4):41–51. doi: 10.1080/14623730.2008.9721775

Downloads

Published

07-08-2026

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE - PEDIATRICS AND ADOLESCENT MEDICINE

How to Cite

1.
Kaur K, Pathmanathan G, Singh B, Krishan K. A thematic analysis of lived experiences of bullying among school going adolescents - Anthropological insights. Acta Biomed. 2026;97(4):19178. doi:10.23750/abm.2026.19178