The Impact of Robotization on Employees' Mental and Physical Health: A Qualitative Study in the Czech and Slovak Republics
Main Article Content
Keywords
occupational health; mental and physical well-being; Central Europe; Industry 4.0; automation; manu-facturing
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to explore the impact of introducing robotic technologies on employees' mental and physical health across three Czech and one Slovak manufacturing company. It sought to understand employees’ subjective experiences and perceptions of organizational support during the robotization process. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted between 2023 and 2025 in four companies. 27 semi-structured interviews with employees (15 women, 12 men) and 19 unstructured interviews with managers (3 women, 16 men) were conducted on-site during working hours. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with open and axial coding. Results: Nine thematic areas were identified: general perceptions, change, fear, problems, support, social relations and communication, employee characteristics, physical health, and mental health. Employees generally perceived robotization positively, noting reduced physical workload and less monotonous or hazardous work. Initial adaptation was challenging, especially due to technical demands and workflow changes. Technical staff experienced higher stress than operators, related to responsibility, troubleshooting, and learning new skills. Technical malfunctions, elevated noise and vibration, and cognitive demands were reported as stressors. Personifying robots and informal knowledge sharing facilitated adaptation. No significant sleep disturbances or substance use linked to robotization were reported. Managers faced a high mental workload due to coordination and supervision responsibilities. Conclusions: When the implementation process is well designed, robotization does not necessarily negatively affect employees’ mental health. The findings highlight the importance of actively addressing organizational and human factors that influence the success of technological change in the workplace. Attention should focus on monitoring cognitive and psychological demands, particularly for technical and managerial staff.
References
2. Gihleb R, Giuntella O, Stella L, Wang TY. Industrial robots, Workers? safety, and health. Labour Econ. 2022;78:102205. Doi: 10.1016/J.Labeco.2022.102205
3. Leso V, Fontana L, Iavicoli I. The occupational health and safety dimension of Industry 4.0. Med Lav. 2018;109(5):327-338. Doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i5.7282
4. Abeliansky AL, Beulmann M, Prettner K. Are they coming for us? Industrial robots and the mental health of workers. Res Policy. 2024;53(3):104956. Doi: 10.1016/J.Respol.2024.104956
5. Berkers HA, Rispens S, Le Blanc PM. The role of robotization in work design: a comparative case study among logistic warehouses. Int J Hum Resour Man. 2023;34(9):1852-1875. Doi: 10.1080/09585192.2022.2043925
6. O’Driscoll MP, Brough P, Timms C, Sawang S. Engagement with information and communication technol-ogy and psychological well-being. In: Perrewé PL, Ganster DC, eds. New developments in theoretical and conceptual approaches to job stress. Emerald Group Publishing; 2010:269-316.
7. Körner U, Müller-Thur K, Lunau T, et al. Perceived stress in human-machine interaction in modern man-ufacturing environments-Results of a qualitative interview study. Stress Health. 2019;35(2):187-199. Doi: 10.1002/smi.2853
8. Dvash A, Mannheim B. Technological coupling, job characteristics and operators’ well-being as moder-ated by desirability of control. Behav Inform Technol. 2001;20(3):225-236. Doi: 10.1080/01449290110044768
9. De Vries H, Bekkers V, Tummers L. Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Admin. 2016;94:146-166. Doi: 10.1111/padm.12209
10. Liu QR, Luo S, Seamans R. Pain or anxiety? The health consequences of rising robot adoption in China. Econ Lett. 2024;236(March):111582. Doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111582
11. Fournier É, Kilgus D, Landry A, et al. The Impacts of Human-Cobot Collaboration on Perceived Cognitive Load and Usability during an Industrial Task: An Exploratory Experiment. Iise T Occup Erg Hum. 2022;10(2):83-90. Doi: 10.1080/24725838.2022.2072021
12. Lukić Nikolić J, Labus P. The Relationship Between Workplace Robots, Employee Exhaustion, and Turn-over Intentions in the Age of Industry 5.0: Research From Four Southeastern European Countries. South East Eur J Econ Bus. 2024;19(2):103-118. Doi: 10.2478/jeb-2024-001
13. Lee C, Kim OH, Lee H. How will automation reshape worker well-being? Evidence from a highly auto-mated economy. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2026;13:111. Doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-06418-y
14. Mehta M, Golani T, Saxena A, Saxena P. Mental health matters: individual, organizational and leadership dynamics on employee mental wellness through organizational interventions. Int J Organ Anal. 2025;33(5):1144-1160. Doi: 10.1108/Ijoa-03-2024-4377
15. Singh J, Michaelides G, Mellor N, et al. The effects of individual and team resilience on psychological health and team performance: a multi-level approach. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(44):33828-33843. Doi: 10.1007/s12144-024-06861-1
16. Robotics IFo. World Robotics 2025 – Press Conference Presentation. Available online: https://ifr.org/downloads/press_docs/PressConference2025_presentation.pdf (Last Accessed on 08 April 2026).
17. Liang CJ, Cheng MH. Trends in Robotics Research in Occupational Safety and Health: A Scientometric Analysis and Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(10):5904. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105904
18. Anton JI, Fernandez-Macias E, Winter-Ebmer R. Does robotization affect job quality? Evidence from Eu-ropean regional labor markets. Ind Relat (Berkeley). 2023;62(3):233-256. Doi: 10.1111/irel.12324
19. Gasparetto A, Scalera L, Palomba I. Robotics and Vibration Mechanics. Appl Sci-Basel. 2022;12(19):9478. Doi: 10.3390/App12199478
20. Willemot L, Gilmour A, Mulford J, Penn D. Noisy Robots? Comparison of Occupational Noise Levels Be-tween Robotic-Assisted and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today. 2024;30:101581. Doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101581
21. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job Demands–Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22(3):273–285. Doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056.
22. Murashov V, Hearl F, Howard J. Working safely with robot workers: Recommendations for the new workplace. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;13(3):D61-D71. Doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1116700
23. Reynolds AC, Lechat B, Melaku YA, et al. Shift work, clinically significant sleep disorders and mental health in a representative, cross-sectional sample of young working adults. Sci Rep. 2022;12:16255. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20308-2
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All Journal's articles are Open Access papers distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
Vladimíra Lipšová, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic, Department of Occupational Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
NONE
How to Cite
