Bridging Two Gaps: A Roadmap for Collaboration Between Occupational Physicians and General Practitioners

Main Article Content

Giuseppe De Palma https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9821-3060

Keywords

Total Worker Health®, Occupational Medicine, General Practice, , Integrated Care, Workplace Health Promotion, Migrant Workers, Italy

Abstract


Occupational physicians (OPs) and general practitioners (GPs) manage overlapping aspects of the same patient’s health yet rarely communicate with one another. By assigning OPs a role in promoting cancer screening, Law 198/2025 has created in Italy a regulatory link between occupational surveillance and public health prevention—a link that cannot function without a structured exchange of data between the two professional roles. This commentary argues that the new regulatory framework, together with Legislative Decree 135/2024 on carcinogens, mutagens, and substances toxic to reproduction, and Legislative Decree 29/2024 on active aging, offers an unprecedented—yet narrow—window of opportunity to build formal collaboration between OPs and GPs in Italy. Another argument concerns the growing presence of foreign-born workers, who may carry undiagnosed endemic conditions and face language barriers that make OP–GP coordination essential for safe fitness-for-work assessments. Drawing on documented challenges from similar initiatives in the Netherlands, Germany, France, and Finland, we identify the main structural obstacles in the Italian context and propose a three-tiered roadmap for implementation, progressing from immediate consensus-based models to the long-term integration of occupational health data into the Electronic Health Record 2.0.


Abstract 281 | PDF Downloads 171

References

1. Persechino B, Fontana L, Buresti G, et al. Collaboration of occupational physicians with national health system and general practitioners in Italy. Ind Health. 2017;55(2):180–191. Doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0101
2. Decreto-Legge 31 ottobre 2025, n. 159. Misure urgenti per la tutela della salute e della sicurezza sui luoghi di lavoro e in materia di protezione civile. GU n. 254 del 31/10/2025. Convertito con modifica-zioni dalla Legge 29 dicembre 2025, n. 198. GU n. 301 del 30/12/2025.
3. Iavicoli I, Spatari G, Chosewood LC, Schulte PA. Occupational Medicine and Total Worker Health®: from preventing health and safety risks in the workplace to promoting health for the total well-being of the worker. Med Lav. 2022;113(6):e2022054. Doi: 10.23749/mdl.v113i6.13891
4. Decreto Legislativo 15 marzo 2024, n. 29. Disposizioni in materia di politiche in favore delle persone an-ziane. GU n. 65 del 18/03/2024.
5. European Commission. EU Strategic Framework on Health and Safety at Work 2021–2027. Luxem-bourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2021.
6. Buijs PC, Gunnyeon B, van Weel C. Primary health care: what role for occupational health? Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(605):e798–e800. Doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X659295
7. INAIL – Consulenza Statistico Attuariale. Gli infortuni sul lavoro e le malattie professionali degli immi-grati. Anni 2019–2023. Roma: INAIL; 2025. Available from: https://www.inail.it
8. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Public health guidance on screening and vaccination for infectious diseases in newly arrived migrants within the EU/EEA. Stockholm: ECDC; 2018.
9. Arató N, Boldsaikhan U, De Brouwere V, et al. Migrant workers occupational health research: an OME-GA-NET working group position paper. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022;95(4):765–777. Doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01803-x
10. International Labour Organization (ILO). Safety and health for migrant workers. Geneva: ILO; 2024. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/resource/safety-and-health-migrant-workers
11. World Health Organization (WHO). Refugee and Migrant Health Toolkit – Tool 12: Workers’ and occu-pational health and safety. Geneva: WHO; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/tools/refugee-and-migrant-health-toolkit/module-3/tool-12
12. Stratil JM, Rieger MA, Völter-Mahlknecht S. Cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health physicians, and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: what are problems and barriers to coop-eration? A qualitative study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017;90(6):481–490. Doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1210-6
13. Stratil JM, Rieger MA, Völter-Mahlknecht S. Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, oc-cupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018;91(7):809–821. Doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1324-y
14. Verger P, Ménard C, Richard JB, Demortière G, Beck F. Collaboration between general practitioners and occupational physicians: a comparison of the results of two national surveys in France. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(2):209–213. Doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000087
15. Moßhammer D, Michaelis M, Mehne J, Wilm S, Rieger MA. General practitioners’ and occupational health physicians’ views on their cooperation: a cross-sectional postal survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016;89(3):449–459. Doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1084-4
16. Reho T, Atkins S, Engblom J, Sumanen M, Viikari-Juntura E, Viljamaa M. Occupational health patients’ parallel use of primary- and secondary-care services and linkage to work disability: a follow-up study in Finland. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023;41(1):1–11. Doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2139362
17. Savinainen M, Mattila-Holappa P, Viljamaa M, et al. Cooperation between public primary health care and occupational health care professionals in work ability–related health issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):11916. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911916
18. Vossen E, Schaafsma FG, van der Gulden JWJ, et al. New paths to interprofessional collaboration: collab-oration between assistant practitioners and practice nurses in general and occupational health care. TSG – Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen. 2022;100(4):162–170. Doi: 10.1007/s12508-022-00374-7
19. Fondazione GIMBE. Monitoraggio PNRR: sanità territoriale e Fascicolo Sanitario Elettronico – aggior-namento 2025–2026. Bologna: GIMBE; 2026. Available from: https://www.gimbe.org
20. Ministero della Salute – Dipartimento per la Trasformazione Digitale. Dati di monitoraggio FSE 2.0. Available from: https://monitopen.fse.salute.gov.it/usage
21. Agenda Digitale. FSE 2.0, ecco la fase tre: cosa cambia per strutture e cittadini. 26 marzo 2026. Available from: https://www.agendadigitale.eu
22. Leso V, Coggiola M, Pira E, et al. Health promotion interventions in occupational settings: fact-finding survey among Italian occupational physicians. Med Lav. 2023;114(2):e2023017. Doi: 10.23749/mdl.v114i2.14417
23. Godono A, Leso V, Paradisi E, et al. Effectiveness of occupational health promotion programs on cardi-ometabolic risk factors: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis. Med Lav. 2025;116(6):18179. Doi: 10.23749/mdl.v116i6.18179
24. Magnavita N, Capitanelli I, Garbarino S, et al. Workplace health promotion programs for older workers in Italy. Med Lav. 2017;108(5). Doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i5.6229
25. Talini D, Baldasseroni A. Workplace health promotion. Med Lav. 2019;110(4):321–324. Doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i4.8525
26. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Fundamentals of Total Worker Health® Approaches. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2017-112. Cincinnati, OH: CDC; 2016.
27. International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH). International Code of Ethics for Occupational Health Professionals. 3rd ed. Rome: ICOH; 2014.
28. Intesa Stato-Regioni 6 agosto 2020, rep. Atti n. 127/CSR. Piano Nazionale della Prevenzione 2020–2025.
29. Intesa Stato-Regioni 23 ottobre 2025. Piano Nazionale Cronicità – Aggiornamento 2025. https://www.salute.gov.it/new/it/news-e-media/notizie/approvato-conferenza-stato-regioni-il-piano-nazionale-della-cronicita/
30. Intesa Stato-Regioni 21 maggio 2026. Piano Nazionale della Prevenzione 2026–2031. Available from: https://www.salute.gov.it
31. Accordo Stato-Regioni 21 maggio 2026. Strategia Nazionale in materia di salute e sicurezza nei luoghi di lavoro 2026–2030. Available from: https://www.salute.gov.it